"Babies on Antipsychotics?...Why would anyone put a BABY on antipsychotic meds?!"
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (12)
In fact, the article pointed out that more and more doctors are writing stronger scripts for younger and younger children, citing a 2009 Food and Drug Administration report which stated that over half a million children and adolescents in America are now taking antipsychotic drugs. Yet some doctors warn of the considerable developmental and physical risks these strong drugs pose to younger children, and say that research has not deemed these meds safe for this age group.
Kyle, who at 18 months was put on antipsychotic drugs to quell severe temper tantrums
If the kid was having temper tantrums it's because the parent(s) either didn't know how to set boundaries or chose to put work or other self-activities before the kid.
By the time he was 3, the poor kid had been diagnosed with autism, bipolar disorder, hyperactivity, insomnia and "oppositional defiant disorder" (um, isn't that a fancy phrase for "normal toddler behavior"?). He was on the antipsychotic Risperdal, the antidepressant Prozac, two sleeping medicines and a pill for attention-deficit disorder.
There is no way anyone can convince me that this kid suffered with all this. It sounds more like poor parenting skills.
I've work with kids with one or more of these so called symptoms and found there was nothing wrong with the kid but with the way the kid was being parented.
Another disturbing nugget of info: A Rutgers University study found that children from low-income families, like Kyle, are four times more likely to receive antipsychotic medicines than children whose parents are privately insured. Why? Because medicating these children is cheaper than asking them to participate in family therapy.
Believable.
- 1 vote
I just (literally today) took a three year old of risperdal. Mom had brought child to me for a second opinion after a neurologist was calling this kid as autistic without any formal diagnosis.
He does have some developmental delay, but I think he is probably ADHD and maybe MR but I had a hard time with the fact more benign interventions hadnt been tried
In fairness though, I have put children as young as three on medication before. (not an antipsychotic) but the choice to treat or not treat isnt black or white
All the comments so far point to a SERIOUS ethical credibility gap in this industry.
And we know if its being commented on here there are 100's if not 1000's of cases elsewhere which go on as the STATUS QUO.
- 1 vote
I believe that people need more parenting skills and less medication for their children. Children have rapidly developing brains and we must remember that for most psychiatric medications we still don't know the mechanism of action. We have NO IDEA what effect these drugs will have on a developing brain because those studies have not been done. I would feel very uncomfortable having a child on these medications.
Diane, RN, BSN
- 2 votes
and studies probably wont be done, for the same reason the arent now. Its bad politics to allow research on children. One of the many reasons doctors are flying blind on meds when prescibing under 17. That is changing the NIMH is allowing for more research on outcomes in adolescent and child studies.
4real?, MD child psychiatry
- 2 votes
How encouraging
the NIMH is allowing for more research on outcomes in adolescent and child studies.
Because the NIMH (WHO, FDA, APA, WPA et al) has such STELLAR track record's regarding research and funding conflicts of interest so far.
A broken system is better than no system at all. Broken can be fixed. And despite your personal grift with pharma in general Autism, Mental Retardation, RADs, depression, anxiety, psychosis etc all exist in people under 21 and there needs to be evidence based treatment for this population.
I agree with you the bias needs to be removed, but to frown on the research being conducted at all is counter-productive.
- 1 vote
counter-productive.
For Who? pharma and its delivery system (the psychiatric industry) have made BILLIONS on the sale of toxic "medications" all the while experimenting (clinical trials) on the elderly, as well as ALL the demographic groups you mentioned above and more. More than $160 BILLION PER YEAR on just one drug. And there are 100's of drugs and SCORES of manufacturers utilyzing UN-ethical promotion and marketing schemes.
Why else do you think they'd (pharma) would be expanding into the realm of
Babies on Antipsychotics?!
and
Big Pharma's Next Big Thing: Antipsychotic Medicines for Preschoolers
It certainly ISN'T a recent sudden on set of widespread epidemic (worldwide) infant & toddler mental illnesses-
IS IT?!?
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



