Dr. Joan Luby, the preschool depression researcher at the center of a New York Times article that failed to mention her past research was funded by Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Shire (SHPGY) and AstraZeneca (AZN), is currently testing the antipsychotic Risperdal on autistic children aged 30 months to 5 years old, according to the ClinicalTrials.gov database.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (7)
Child Psychiatrist Under Scrutiny for Ties to Pharma unrelated psychiatrist
Drug maker Janssen faces litigation over disclosure **Warning** Graphic Content
The drug Respirdal (respirdone) is well documented to cause IRREVERSIBLE BREAST GROWTH IN MALE CHILDREN.
Flickr pic of a BABY STRAIGHT JACKET (linked from the article)
Mental Health Declaration of Human Rights
A. The right to full informed consent; including:
1. The scientific/medical test confirming any alleged diagnoses of psychiatric disorder and the right to refute any psychiatric diagnoses of mental “illness” that cannot be medically confirmed.
2. Full disclosure of all documented risks of any proposed drug or “treatment”.
3. The right to be informed of all available medical treatments which do not include the administration of a psychiatric drug or treatment.
4. The right to refuse any treatment the patient considers harmful.
WTF? Have people become so stupid as to put their children on drugs like these? I have never heard of a psychotic 2 year old, and I am pretty sure there are other ways of handling them if there are. Years and years ago I read an article about conspiracy theories, and one of them stated that the pharma companies had circulated a memo that it was their intention to have every man, woman, and child on some kind of drug by the year 2000.( I used to laugh at this). I think they are a few years behind schedule. It seems that every drug they put on the market causes more problems, and of course they put you on more drugs to "fix" the problems caused by the first one. I guess they have maxed out on the adults, so now they are going after the youngest, knowing that they will have lifelong customers!
Deinstitutionalisation is the practice of moving people (especially those with mental disorders and developmental disability) from mental institutions into community-based or family-based environments.
The idea took hold in various countries in the 1950s and 1960s[1] as a cost saving measure, or a sensible alternative to state hospitals, as long as the discharged patients were serviced in their new community health centers and were able to take their necessary medications. New psychiatric medications were thought to have made it also possible to release this population into the community safely. [2]
--
On the other hand, organizations with thousands of members such as MindFreedom International and World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry and The Citizens Commission on Human Rights, maintain that psychiatrists exaggerate the evidence of medication and minimize the evidence of adverse drug reaction. They and other activists also complain that individuals are not given sufficient balanced information or truly informed consent; that current psychiatric medications do not appear to be specific to particular disorders in the way mainstream psychiatry asserts [10]; and that psychiatric drugs not only don't correct measurable chemical imbalances in the brain, but also induce undesirable side effects. For example, though children on Ritalin and other psycho-stimulants become more obedient to parents and teachers, critics have noted that they also develop abnormal movements such as tics, spasms and other involuntary movements [11].
--
The influence of pharmaceutical companies is another major issue for the antipsychiatry movement. The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most profitable and powerful in existence, and as Joe Sharkey has argued there are many financial and professional links between psychiatry, regulators and pharmaceutical companies. Drug companies routinely fund much of the research conducted by psychiatrists; routinely advertise medication in psychiatric journals and conferences; routinely fund psychiatric and healthcare organizations and health promotion campaigns; and routinely send representatives to lobby general physicians and politicians. Sharkey and other investigators of the psycho-pharmaceutical industry maintain that many psychiatrists are members, shareholders or special advisors to pharmaceutical or associated regulatory organizations [12].
The systemic wide practices of deinstitutionalization, community based mental health care, and the wide spread medicating of the masses are all interconnected as a pharma based market and revenue stream generation strategy.
If it wasn't planned it CERTAINLY was recognized and maximized for profits.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



