Is it any wonder that, when confronted with overwhelming evidence of misconduct and malfeasance the psychiatric community will justify, posture, pr, spin, and claim their abuse was part of a "treatment" protocol and, in this case invalidate the victim to the point of claiming that...it's ok because, in his professional opinion his patient wasn't harmed while being penetrated in his office, on his couch, during a treatment session.
So then the extrapolation becomes, in effect, she's lying in her suit against him.
The classic symptomatic examples of predatory behavior as exhibited by yet another professional, research published psychiatrist caught in an unethical situation.




